|
UV Index
Introduction
The UV Index is an international standard measurement
of the strength of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun is at a specific
place on a particular day. The scale is principally used as part of a weather
forecast, aimed at the general public, to inform people of the potential UV
exposure they can expect on a given day. This enables the public to protect
themselves against excessive exposure to UV, which can cause sunburn, eye
damage (e.g. cataracts), skin ageing and skin cancer [1].
The index is an open-ended scale, with higher values
representing higher UV exposures and therefore greater risk of skin damage due
to the UV exposure. An index of 0 is theoretically possible, but unlikely to
actually occur. An index as high as 8 is rare in the UK, but indices higher
than 11 are quite common in the southern hemisphere where the ozone layer is
depleted. Values as high as 17 have apparently been recorded in Carnarvon,
Western Australia[1].
History
In 1992, three scientists from Environment Canada
developed the UV index and Canada became the first country to broadcast
forecasts of the predicted daily UV levels for the next day. UV indices started
to be used by other countries, but using different methods of calculation.
Until recently, the methods of calculating and reporting a UV index varied from
country to country.
The World Health Organization eventually standardised
the UV Index method and now the international UV Index specifies a standard
calculation method and standard graphics for reporting forecasts for worldwide
use.
Erythema Curve
The erythema curve indicates the UV exposure required
to induce erythema of human skin - a redness of the skin resulting from
inflammation, in this case, as caused by sunburn.
Note that the erythema curve includes the human skin
response to UV-A (wavelengths between 315nm and 400nm) and UV-B (wavelengths
between 280nm and 315nm). UV-C is absorbed by the ozone layer and does not
reach the earth's surface. However, in the Southern Hemisphere there are holes
in the ozone layer and UV-C must be considered here.

Taking a couple of readings from the graph, it shows
that, for example, at a wavelength of 295nm the skin is a thousand times more
sensitive than to UV at 340nm.
Three of our UV sensors have filters which match the erythema
action curve of human skin.
EryF - based on the
TW30SX
Eryca - based on the
TW30SX
EryF* - based on the
SG01S
The filter window material in each sensor corrects the sensor
response so that it matches the erythema curve and therefore the output current
will be directly proportional to the UV Index.
Calculation of UV Index
The UV Index itself is an irradiance scale calculated
by multiplying the Erythema corrected irradiance in watts per m2 by
40[2].
Sample Calculation
IMPORTANT - see comment below regarding this
calculation.
An EryF* sensor gives an output current of 1.485 x
10-8 amps when exposed to sunlight on a certain day.
From the
EryF*
datasheet:
Sensitivity, Smax of EryF* = 0.11 Amps/Watt
Active area of EryF* = 0.054 mm2 = 5.4 x
10-8m2
|
Incident Watts (W) |
= Output amps/Smax |
| |
= 1.485 x 10-9/0.11 |
| |
= 1.35 x 10-8W |
| |
|
|
Incident Watts per m2 |
= Incident Watts (W)/Active area (m2) |
| |
= 1.35 x 10-8/5.4 x 10-8 |
| |
= 0.25 W/m2 |
| |
|
|
UV Index |
= Incident Watts per m2 x 40 |
| |
= 0.25 x 40 |
| |
= 10 |
So in this sample calculation, the UV Index is calculated as
10.
IMPORTANT - The above calculation does not take into
account the missmatch between the UV sensor filter characteristics and the
Erythema curve which can introduce an error of up to x5 in the UV index
calculation figure. We will update this web page once we have more information
on this.
Notes:
EryF* has a ±5% variation in Smax from unit to
unit. Long exposure to high UV radiation does not affect its sensitivity.
EryF and Eryca have an actual output up to 50% higher
than the given figure for Smax. These sensors are not as reliable as
EryF* but there is no measurable degradation over lifetime either.
For sun UV detection we recommend using the
ERYCA because it is stable enough and, once calibrated,
it provides stunning precision performance, far superior to that of SiC or
AlGaN sensors.
New products, including a hydrid component combining a
chip and an amplifier which will be calibrated during manfacture, are currently
under development. Please contact us us for
more details.
Please contact us with any
questions or queries. |